"Uncovering Hidden Wallet Backdoors in Deceit V2.5"

[gergeti]

Title: Uncovering Hidden Wallet Backdoors in Deceit V2.5

"Hey fellow Deceit fans, I noticed Deceit V2.5 has been gaining traction lately, but I've been digging through the code and I'm not 100% convinced it's completely secure. I stumbled upon some suspicious looking wallets that seem to have been added quietly in the latest update, anyone else notice these additions? Can we work together to uncover what's really going on?"

 

[Cybermind]

"Dude, just wanna say I've been using Deceit for a while now and haven't had any major issues, but this is some shady stuff. If anyone figures out how to close these backdoors, hit me up. I'm not gonna risk losing my funds, bro."

 

[jeremmy]

I've been digging into this Deceit V2.5 thing for a bit, and I gotta say, it's not looking great. Their supposed "audits" seem super shallow, and I'm starting to think they're hiding something. Has anyone else seen any red flags in the code?

 

[Alfer_Sandro]

"Just got my hands on the latest Deceit V2.5 audit report and I'm seeing some red flags. Looks like the devs tried to sneak in some suspicious contract interactions. Has anyone else dug through the code and found anything suspicious?"

 

[Cartesioso]

"Dude, I've been digging around and I found some weird code in the Deceit V2.5 whitepaper. It looks like they used a custom implementation of the ECDSA algorithm, but I'm not sure if that's a backdoor or just a security feature. Can someone with some crypto math skills take a closer look?"

 

[Siracuz]

"Just did some digging and yeah, that Deceit wallet update is looking shady. Found some code snippets that suggest they might be storing user data on a cloud server, which is a total no-go for me. Anyone else find any concrete evidence?"

 

[romajew]

"Yoooo, just ran this wallet through the usual tests and I gotta say, I found some suspicious code in the update logs. Looks like it's trying to send a daily report to some server on the dark web, but I'm not sure what it's reporting on. Anyone else dig up anything shady?"

 

[shrek2]

"Whoa, just read the first few pages and I'm already seeing some red flags. Anyone have experience reversing Deceit's new contracts? I'm curious to see if others have found potential backdoors beyond what's mentioned in the OP."

 

[ard]

"Lol, I've been warning people about that wallet for weeks. The dev team seems pretty shady and their GitHub is a mess. Can we get some more concrete evidence before making any accusations?"

 

[serschey]

"Just took a look at the Deceit V2.5 code, and I'm seeing some suspicious API calls to a third-party library that's got some shady reputation in the past. Anyone else digging into this? Might need to keep an extra eye on our wallets"

 

[H1nt]

"Dude, I've been looking into Deceit V2.5 and I gotta say, their 'improved wallet security' sounds more like marketing speak to me. Can anyone confirm if they're actually using secure multisig setups or is it just a bunch of hype?"

 

[drimsmit]

"just went over the audit report and I gotta say, the devs have been pretty transparent about the security measures they've implemented. Still, I'm a bit concerned about the vulnerability in the multisig wallet feature, anyone have an ETA on a patch?"

 

[dyimik]

"Dude, I've been using Deceit for a hot second and can confirm their wallet audit report doesn't mention any backdoors. That being said, I've been digging and found a commit from 6 months ago that might've slipped through the cracks. Anyone have a developer's eye on this?"

 

[carolina]

"Dude, I'm super paranoid about Deceit V2.5 after reading this thread. I've been using an air-gapped setup with my own custom wallet since the last major update, and I'm hoping that's enough to keep me safe. Anyone else using a similar setup?"

 

[yer]

"Dude, I think @CryptoSniper was onto something with that audit tool. Ran it on my Deceit wallet and found some suspicious code that's not in the public repo. Anyone else have similar results?"