Ledger vs Trezor 2025: Which Hardware Wallet is Better?

Ommyflashing · Nov 14, 2025

Ledger vs Trezor 2025: Which Hardware Wallet is Better?

Introduction

Can't decide between Ledger and Trezor? This comprehensive comparison analyzes both hardware wallet brands in 2025. We'll compare Ledger Nano X vs Trezor Model T, Ledger Nano S Plus vs Trezor Model One, security models, supported coins, software ecosystems, pricing, and help you choose which hardware wallet is better for your needs. Whether you prioritize open-source (Trezor), multi-chain support (Ledger), or maximum security, this detailed Ledger vs Trezor guide has the answer.

Quick Answer (TL;DR):

Ledger wins: Multi-chain portfolios, mobile users, staking, beginners, budget
Trezor wins: Open-source advocates, Bitcoin-first users, touchscreen preference, privacy
Both excellent: Either brand will secure your crypto well

Truth: Both are industry leaders with 10+ years of experience securing billions. There's no definitively "better" brand - only better for YOUR specific needs.

Brand Overview

Understanding the companies:

Ledger (France)

Company Background:

Founded: 2014 (Paris, France)
Founders: Éric Larchevêque, Thomas France, Joel Pobeda, Nicolas Bacca
Headquarters: Paris, France (EU-based)
Employees: 300+ (2025)
Funding: $380M+ raised (Series C in 2021)
Investors: 10T, Tekne Capital, Draper Esprit

Market Position:

Market leader (50%+ hardware wallet market share)
5+ million devices sold
Available in 165+ countries
Partnerships: Samsung, Neufund, crypto.com

Product Philosophy:

Closed-source secure element (bank-grade chip)
Maximum coin support (5,500+ assets)
User-friendly ecosystem (Ledger Live)
Mobile-first approach (Bluetooth)
French design aesthetic

Notable Incidents:

2020 data breach (customer database leaked - names, emails, addresses)
NO funds or seed phrases compromised
Company transparent about incident
Enhanced security post-breach

Trezor (Czech Republic)

Company Background:

Founded: 2013 (Prague, Czech Republic)
Manufacturer: SatoshiLabs
Founders: Marek "Slush" Palatinus, Pavol "Stick" Rusnák
Headquarters: Prague, Czech Republic (EU-based)
Employees: 100+ (2025)
Funding: Privately held, bootstrap-funded

Market Position:

First hardware wallet (invented category, 2013)
Second-largest market share (~30%)
1+ million devices sold
Strong Bitcoin community reputation
Open-source pioneer

Product Philosophy:

Fully open-source (hardware + firmware)
Transparency over certification
Bitcoin-first heritage
Privacy-focused (Czech privacy culture)
Community-driven development

Notable Incidents:

2019: Physical attack demonstration (extract seed with lab equipment)
Acknowledged vulnerability, recommended passphrase use
Transparency = disclosed publicly
No remote hacks ever

Key Differences

Ledger:

Closed-source (trust certification)
5,500+ coins (broadest support)
Bluetooth enabled (mobile)
French tech company
Venture-backed

Trezor:

Open-source (trust code)
1,000+ coins (major chains)
No Bluetooth (USB-only)
Bitcoin pioneers
Bootstrap-funded

Product Lineup Comparison

All models side-by-side:

Ledger Models (2025)

Ledger Nano X:

Price: $149
Screen: 128x64 pixels
Bluetooth: Yes
Battery: Yes (8+ hours)
Connector: USB-C
Released: 2019
Status: Flagship model

Ledger Nano S Plus:

Price: $79
Screen: 128x64 pixels
Bluetooth: No
Battery: No
Connector: USB-C
Released: 2022
Status: Budget flagship

Ledger Stax (2024):

Price: $279
Screen: E-ink touchscreen (curved)
Bluetooth: Yes
Battery: Yes
Released: 2024
Status: Premium model (limited availability)

Trezor Models (2025)

Trezor Model T:

Price: $219
Screen: 240×240 touchscreen (color)
Bluetooth: No
Battery: No
Connector: USB-C
Released: 2018
Status: Flagship model

Trezor Model One:

Price: $69
Screen: 128x64 OLED (small)
Bluetooth: No
Battery: No
Connector: Micro-USB (outdated)
Released: 2013 (continuously updated)
Status: Entry-level model

Trezor Safe 3 (2023):

Price: $79
Screen: 128x64 color LCD
Bluetooth: No
Battery: No
Connector: USB-C
Released: 2023
Status: Budget model (alternative to Model One)

Price Comparison

Category	Ledger	Trezor
Entry-Level	Nano S Plus ($79)	Model One ($69) / Safe 3 ($79)
Mid-Range	Nano X ($149)	-
Flagship	Nano X ($149)	Model T ($219)
Premium	Stax ($279)	-

Price Winner: Ledger (better value at each tier)

Head-to-Head Comparison

Flagship Battle: Ledger Nano X ($149) vs Trezor Model T ($219)

Design & Build

Ledger Nano X:

Dimensions: 72 x 18.6 x 11.75 mm (USB stick size)
Weight: 34g
Materials: Brushed stainless steel + plastic
Buttons: 2 physical buttons (sides)
Feels: Premium, pocketable, durable

Trezor Model T:

Dimensions: 64 x 39 x 10 mm (wider, flatter)
Weight: 22g
Materials: Black plastic + glass touchscreen
Input: Full color touchscreen (240×240)
Feels: Modern, smartphone-like, larger footprint

Winner: Tie

Nano X: More portable, premium materials
Model T: Better screen, touchscreen convenience

Display

Ledger Nano X:

Size: 128x64 pixels (0.95 inch diagonal)
Type: Monochrome OLED
Brightness: Good (OLED)
Visibility: Clear but small text
Touch: No (buttons only)

Trezor Model T:

Size: 240×240 pixels (2.4 inch diagonal)
Type: Color LCD touchscreen
Brightness: Excellent
Visibility: Large, easy to read, color
Touch: Yes (on-screen keyboard)

Winner: Trezor Model T (much better screen)

2.5x larger display area
Color vs monochrome
Touchscreen = easier PIN entry

Connectivity

Ledger Nano X:

USB-C: Yes
Bluetooth: Yes (BLE 5.0)
Battery: Yes (100mAh, 8+ hours)
Mobile: iOS + Android (via Bluetooth)
Desktop: Windows, Mac, Linux (USB-C)

Trezor Model T:

USB-C: Yes
Bluetooth: No
Battery: No (USB-powered only)
Mobile: Android via USB-C OTG adapter
Desktop: Windows, Mac, Linux (USB-C)

Winner: Ledger Nano X

Bluetooth = mobile convenience
Battery = wireless operation
True mobile-first experience

Trezor Advantage:

No Bluetooth = no wireless attack surface (purists prefer)
USB-only = simpler, more secure theoretically

Security Architecture

Ledger Nano X:

Chip: ST33J2M0 secure element
Certification: CC EAL5+ (bank-grade)
Design: Dual-chip (secure element + STM32 MCU)
Source: Closed-source firmware
Physical: Anti-tamper coating, sealed case

Trezor Model T:

Chip: ARM Cortex-M4 + custom secure storage
Certification: None (open-source instead)
Design: Single chip (no certified secure element)
Source: Fully open-source (hardware + firmware)
Physical: No anti-tamper, transparent about vulnerabilities

Winner: Depends on philosophy

Ledger Advantage:

CC EAL5+ certification (government/military grade)
Secure element = hardware-level security
More resistant to physical attacks

Trezor Advantage:

Open-source = verifiable (community audited)
No "black box" - see exactly what code runs
Trust through transparency vs trust through authority

Security Track Record:

Ledger: No device compromises (10+ years)
Trezor: No remote hacks (11+ years), physical attack possible with lab equipment

Verdict: Both secure for 99.9% of users. Choose based on: Trust certification (Ledger) vs Trust code (Trezor).

Supported Assets

Ledger Nano X:

Coins: 5,500+ cryptocurrencies and tokens
Blockchains: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand, Avalanche, Polygon, BNB Chain, Fantom, Harmony, Tron, Tezos, Stellar, Ripple, etc.
Tokens: All ERC-20, BEP-20, SPL, etc.
NFTs: View in Ledger Live

Trezor Model T:

Coins: 1,000+ cryptocurrencies and tokens
Blockchains: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, Ripple, Litecoin, Dash, Zcash, Stellar, Monero, EOS, Tezos, Binance Chain
Tokens: ERC-20, limited others
NFTs: Limited support

Missing on Trezor:

Solana (major L1!)
Polkadot (major L1!)
Cosmos (major L1!)
Algorand
Avalanche (limited)
Many modern chains

Winner: Ledger Nano X (5.5x more assets)

If you hold ONLY BTC + ETH: Both fine
If multi-chain portfolio: Ledger essential

Software Ecosystem

Ledger Live:

Platform: Desktop (Win, Mac, Linux) + Mobile (iOS, Android)
Interface: Beautiful, modern, intuitive
Features:
- Portfolio tracking (live prices, charts)
- Buy crypto (via partners: MoonPay, Coinify, etc.)
- Sell crypto (via partners)
- Swap (via 1inch, Paraswap aggregators)
- Stake (ETH, SOL, ATOM, DOT, ALGO, etc. - 15+ coins)
- NFT gallery (view/send NFTs)
- Discover (curated dApps)
Updates: Frequent (monthly)
Support: Excellent documentation

Trezor Suite:

Platform: Desktop (Win, Mac, Linux) + Web version
Interface: Clean, functional, minimalist
Features:
- Portfolio tracking (basic)
- Buy crypto (via partners: Invity)
- Sell crypto (via partners)
- No native swap
- No native staking
- Limited NFT support
- Labeling (organize UTXOs)
- Tor support (privacy)
Updates: Regular (quarterly)
Support: Good documentation

Winner: Ledger Live

More features (staking, better swap, NFTs)
Better UI/UX
Mobile app superior
More integrated experience

Trezor Suite Advantage:

Privacy-focused (Tor)
Open-source
Lighter weight
Bitcoin power-user features (coin control, UTXO labeling)

Staking

Ledger (via Ledger Live):

Supported: Ethereum (Lido), Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, Algorand, Tezos, Tron, Celo, Osmosis, Persistence, Quicksilver, Onomy, 15+ total
Process: Click "Earn" → Stake → Confirm on device
Rewards: Shown in app, auto-claimed
Validators: Curated by Ledger (or choose own)
APY: 3-20% depending on coin

Trezor:

Supported: None natively
Must use: Third-party services (Everstake, Exodus, etc.)
Process: Export wallet, use external platform
Rewards: Track externally

Winner: Ledger Nano X (massive advantage)

Native staking in Ledger Live
15+ stakeable coins
Seamless UX

Price & Value

Ledger Nano X:

Price: $149
Value: Excellent
- Bluetooth + battery ($20 value)
- 5,500 coins ($30 value premium)
- Superior software ($20 value)
- Total value: $219+ for $149

Trezor Model T:

Price: $219
Value: Good
- Touchscreen ($40 premium)
- Open-source (priceless for some)
- Color display ($15 premium)
- But: Fewer coins, no Bluetooth

Winner: Ledger Nano X (better price-to-value ratio)

$70 cheaper
More features (Bluetooth, battery, 5.5x coins, staking)
Only missing: Touchscreen, open-source

When Trezor T Worth $70 More:

You value open-source > everything
You prefer touchscreen
You only hold BTC + ETH (coin support irrelevant)

User Experience

Ledger Nano X:

Setup: 10 minutes (easy, guided)
Daily use: Buttons (navigate left/right, confirm)
PIN entry: 8 digits max, button input (slower)
Mobile: Seamless (Bluetooth)
Speed: Fast (instant Bluetooth pairing)
Learning curve: Low (beginner-friendly)

Trezor Model T:

Setup: 10 minutes (easy, touchscreen)
Daily use: Touchscreen (intuitive)
PIN entry: On-screen keypad (faster, more secure vs computer keyboard)
Mobile: Requires OTG adapter (cumbersome)
Speed: Depends on USB connection
Learning curve: Low (touchscreen intuitive)

Winner: Tie

Nano X: Better mobile experience (Bluetooth)
Model T: Better desktop experience (touchscreen)

Overall Flagship Winner: Ledger Nano X

Score:

Ledger Nano X: 7 wins (connectivity, coins, software, staking, price, value, mobile)
Trezor Model T: 2 wins (display, open-source philosophy)
Tie: 3 (design, security track record, desktop UX)

Ledger Nano X is better for:

Multi-chain holders (Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos holders)
Mobile users (Bluetooth essential)
Stakers (15+ coins)
Budget-conscious ($70 savings)
Beginners (better software)

Trezor Model T is better for:

Open-source purists (transparency matters)
Bitcoin/Ethereum-only holders (coin support irrelevant)
Touchscreen lovers (better input)
Privacy advocates (no Bluetooth, Czech laws)
Those with $219 budget (willing to pay premium)

Budget Battle: Ledger Nano S Plus ($79) vs Trezor Model One ($69)

Quick Comparison

Feature	Nano S Plus	Model One
Price	$79	$69
Screen	128x64 (larger)	128x64 (smaller)
Connector	USB-C	Micro-USB
Coins	5,500+	1,000+
Apps	100+	10-15
Security	EAL5+ secure element	No secure element
Open-Source	No	Yes
Released	2022	2013

Key Differences

Ledger Nano S Plus Advantages:

USB-C (modern, vs outdated Micro-USB)
Larger screen (128x64 but bigger physical size)
More app storage (100 vs 10-15)
5,500 coins (vs 1,000)
Secure element (EAL5+ vs none)
Newer (2022 vs 2013 design)

Trezor Model One Advantages:

$10 cheaper ($69 vs $79)
Open-source (verifiable)
Pioneering product (first hardware wallet)
No batteries to fail (USB-powered)

Overall Budget Winner: Ledger Nano S Plus

Why:

Only $10 more but MUCH better value
USB-C (future-proof)
5.5x more coins
10x more app storage
Secure element (hardware security)
Modern design

When to Choose Trezor Model One:

Absolute cheapest option ($69)
Open-source mandatory
Bitcoin-only holder (storage irrelevant)

Recommendation: Spend extra $10 for Nano S Plus. Massive value improvement.

Trezor Safe 3 ($79) vs Ledger Nano S Plus ($79)

New contender: Trezor Safe 3 (released 2023)

Trezor Safe 3:

Price: $79 (same as Nano S Plus)
Screen: Color LCD (better than Model One's monochrome)
Connector: USB-C (modern)
Security: Secure Element (new for Trezor!)
Open-Source: Yes
Released: 2023

vs Ledger Nano S Plus:

Same price ($79)
Both USB-C
Both have secure elements
Trezor: Open-source + color screen
Ledger: 5,500 coins vs 1,000, better software

Winner: Still Ledger Nano S Plus

5.5x more coins (critical for multi-chain)
Better software (Ledger Live vs Trezor Suite)
Staking support (none on Trezor)

But: Trezor Safe 3 is now competitive (closed gap with secure element + USB-C)

Choose Safe 3 if:

Open-source required
Bitcoin/Ethereum only
Color screen preference

Deep Dive: Security Comparison

The most important factor:

Security Architecture

Ledger Approach:

Secure Element:

Uses ST33J2M0 chip
Common Criteria EAL5+ certified
Same chip used in passports, credit cards
Tamper-resistant hardware
Closed-source (proprietary)

Dual-Chip Design:

Secure Element (ST33): Stores private keys, signs transactions
MCU (STM32): Handles USB communication, display, buttons

Why Dual-Chip:

Secure element = Fort Knox (keys never leave)
MCU = Interface (compromised MCU can't access keys)
Separation of concerns

Certification:

CC EAL5+ = highest commercial certification
Government/military grade
Independent audits (BSI, ANSSI)
Banking industry standard

Trade-off:

More secure hardware
BUT: Closed-source (can't verify firmware)
Must trust Ledger + auditors

Trezor Approach:

No Secure Element (Model One, Model T):

Uses general-purpose ARM Cortex-M processors
Custom secure storage (open-source implementation)
No certification (by choice)
Relies on firmware security

Why No Secure Element:

Secure elements are closed-source (contradicts open-source philosophy)
Trust code, not black box chips
Community can audit entire stack

Secure Element (Safe 3 - NEW):

2023: Trezor finally added secure element (Optiga)
Still open-source (rare achievement)
Compromise: Security + transparency

Certification:

None (philosophy: open-source IS certification)
Community audits
Transparency over credentials

Trade-off:

Fully verifiable (open-source)
BUT: Vulnerable to physical attacks (with sophisticated equipment)
Requires passphrase for maximum security

Open-Source vs Closed-Source

Trezor (Open-Source):

What's Open:

Firmware source code (GitHub)
Bootloader source code
Hardware schematics (circuit diagrams)
Build instructions

Benefits:

Verifiable (anyone can audit)
No hidden backdoors
Community security researchers review
Trust through transparency

Downsides:

Attackers also see code (security through obscurity lost)
Secure elements unavailable (closed IP)

Verification Process:

Clone GitHub repo
Build firmware yourself
Compare hash to device firmware
Cryptographically verify authenticity

Ledger (Closed-Source):

What's Closed:

Secure element firmware (proprietary)
Most application code
Hardware design details

What's Open:

Some components (crypto libraries)
Apps (Bitcoin, Ethereum apps on GitHub)
Partial transparency

Benefits:

Secure element technology (requires closed-source)
CC EAL5+ certification (audited by governments)
Professional security testing

Downsides:

Can't fully verify
Must trust Ledger
"Black box" criticism

Defense:

"Certification IS verification"
Government auditors reviewed
Bank-grade security standards

Attack Resistance

Physical Attacks:

Scenario: Attacker has physical access to device

Ledger:

Secure element = very difficult to extract keys
Anti-tamper coating (destroys chip if opened)
PIN brute-force protection (wipes after attempts)
Passphrase adds layer
Result: Very difficult even with lab equipment

Trezor (Model One, Model T):

No secure element = vulnerable to physical attacks
2019: Researchers demonstrated seed extraction (voltage glitching)
Requires: Physical device + specialized equipment + expertise
Mitigation: Use passphrase (changes wallet entirely)
Result: Vulnerable IF no passphrase + attacker sophisticated

Winner: Ledger (secure element makes physical attacks near-impossible)

Note: Realistically, physical attacks require:

Physical possession of device
$1,000+ equipment
Technical expertise
Not threat for 99% of users

Remote Attacks:

Scenario: Hacker attempts to steal keys via internet

Both Ledger & Trezor:

Keys NEVER leave device
Transaction signed offline
Computer can be fully infected → keys still safe
Physical confirmation required
Result: Both immune to remote attacks

Track Record:

Ledger: 0 remote hacks (10 years)
Trezor: 0 remote hacks (11 years)

Winner: Tie (both perfect track record)

Supply Chain Attacks:

Scenario: Device tampered with before reaching you

Ledger:

Firmware checks (device verifies genuine firmware on startup)
Anti-tamper seal (check on arrival)
Attestation (secure element proves authenticity)
Recommendation: Buy from official site

Trezor:

Open-source = you can verify firmware yourself
Holographic seal (check on arrival)
Build firmware from source (paranoid users)
Recommendation: Buy from official site

Winner: Tie (both have protections, buy from official site)

Vulnerability History

Ledger:

2018: Vulnerability in web interface (fixed)

Impact: Low (no funds at risk)

2020: Customer database breach

270,000 customers (emails, addresses, phone numbers)
NO seed phrases, NO funds compromised
Data breach, NOT device hack
Result: Phishing risk increased, privacy concern

Overall: Device itself never compromised

Trezor:

2019: Physical attack demonstrated

Researchers extracted seed from Model One (voltage glitching)
Requires: Physical device + $1000 equipment + expertise
Mitigation: Use passphrase
Trezor transparent: Disclosed publicly, recommended passphrase

2020: Phishing attack warning

Fake Trezor emails (industry-wide issue)
Not Trezor's fault
User education

Overall: No remote hacks, physical vulnerability acknowledged

Security Verdict

Ledger Wins:

Secure element (hardware-level security)
CC EAL5+ certification (audited)
More resistant to physical attacks
Professional testing

Trezor Wins:

Open-source (verifiable, no backdoors)
Community auditing (transparency)
Trust through code (not trust through authority)

Both Excellent:

0 remote hacks (10+ years combined)
Billions of dollars secured safely
Industry-leading security

Choose Based On:

Trust hardware certification? → Ledger
Trust open-source code? → Trezor
Need maximum physical security? → Ledger
Need maximum transparency? → Trezor

For 99.9% of users: Both are secure. Bigger risks are:

User error (phishing, fake sites)
Losing seed phrase
Not using hardware wallet at all

Supported Coins Comparison

Critical for multi-chain holders:

Ledger Supported Assets

Total: 5,500+ cryptocurrencies and tokens

Major Blockchains:

Bitcoin (+ forks: BCH, LTC, DOGE, etc.)
Ethereum (+ all ERC-20 tokens)
Solana (+ all SPL tokens)
Cardano (ADA)
Polkadot (DOT)
Cosmos (ATOM + IBC chains)
Algorand (ALGO)
Avalanche (AVAX + C-Chain tokens)
Polygon (MATIC + tokens)
BNB Chain (BNB + BEP-20 tokens)
Fantom (FTM)
Harmony (ONE)
Tron (TRX + TRC-20 tokens)
Tezos (XTZ)
Stellar (XLM)
Ripple (XRP)
Monero (XMR)
Zcash (ZEC)
Dash (DASH)
Decred (DCR)
Near Protocol (NEAR)
Hedera (HBAR)
Internet Computer (ICP)
And 5,480+ more

Layer 2s:

Arbitrum (ETH L2)
Optimism (ETH L2)
Polygon zkEVM
Base (Coinbase L2)
zkSync Era
Starknet

Hot Altcoins (2025):

Solana (SOL)
Avalanche (AVAX)
Polkadot (DOT)
Cosmos (ATOM)
Algorand (ALGO)
Near (NEAR)

Trezor Supported Assets

Total: 1,000+ cryptocurrencies and tokens

Major Blockchains:

Bitcoin (+ forks: BCH, LTC, DOGE, etc.)
Ethereum (+ ERC-20 tokens)
Cardano (ADA)
Ripple (XRP)
Binance Chain (BNB)
Stellar (XLM)
Monero (XMR)
Tezos (XTZ)
EOS
Litecoin (LTC)
Dash (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)

Layer 2s (limited):

Some Ethereum L2s via MetaMask integration

Missing Major Coins:

Solana (SOL) - major L1!
Polkadot (DOT) - major L1!
Cosmos (ATOM) - major ecosystem!
Algorand (ALGO)
Avalanche (limited support)
Near Protocol (NEAR)
Hedera (HBAR)
Many modern chains

Coin Support Winner: Ledger (Massive Victory)

Numbers:

Ledger: 5,500+ assets
Trezor: 1,000+ assets
Ledger has 5.5x more coins

Real Impact:

If you hold:

Bitcoin + Ethereum only → Both fine
Bitcoin + Ethereum + Cardano → Both fine
Bitcoin + Ethereum + Solana → Ledger ONLY
Multi-chain portfolio (10+ coins) → Ledger ONLY

Popular Coins Missing on Trezor:

Solana (Top 5 by market cap)
Polkadot (Major L0)
Cosmos (Major ecosystem)
Algorand (Popular PoS chain)

Verdict: If you have multi-chain portfolio, Ledger is mandatory. Trezor only viable for Bitcoin + Ethereum maximalists.

Software Comparison

Daily user experience:

Ledger Live

Platform Availability:

Desktop: Windows, macOS, Linux (native apps)
Mobile: iOS, Android (native apps)
Integration: Seamless sync between desktop/mobile

Interface:

Design: Modern, beautiful, intuitive
Theme: Light/dark mode
Navigation: Clean, organized
Learning curve: Low (beginner-friendly)

Core Features:

1. Portfolio Management:

Real-time prices (CoinGecko integration)
Holdings overview (pie chart, list view)
24h change tracking
Profit/loss calculation
Multi-currency display (USD, EUR, BTC, etc.)
Account organization (name accounts, hide zero balances)

2. Buy Crypto:

Integrated fiat on-ramps
Partners: MoonPay, Coinify, Transak, Wyre
Payment methods: Credit card, bank transfer, Apple Pay, Google Pay
100+ fiat currencies supported
Fees: 1-5% (partner fees, not Ledger)
Crypto arrives directly in hardware wallet

3. Sell Crypto:

Integrated fiat off-ramps
Sell to bank account
Partners: Coinify, others
Fees: 1-3%

4. Swap (Exchange):

Aggregator: 1inch, Paraswap, Changelly
Best rates automatically found
Swap between chains (e.g., ETH on Ethereum → ETH on Polygon)
Fees: 1% Ledger fee + network fees
Confirm on hardware wallet

5. Staking:

Supported: Ethereum (Lido), Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, Algorand, Tezos, Tron, Osmosis, Persistence, Quicksilver, Onomy
Process: "Earn" tab → Choose coin → Stake → Confirm
Rewards: Auto-calculated, displayed in app
Validators: Curated by Ledger (or choose custom)
APY: 3-20% depending on coin
Unstaking: Visible timelines (e.g., 21 days for Cosmos)

6. NFT Gallery:

View NFTs in wallet
Send NFTs
Organized by collection
OpenSea integration
Ethereum, Polygon NFTs

7. Discover (dApp Browser):

Curated dApps
Categories: DeFi, NFTs, Games
Examples: Uniswap, Aave, Lido, OpenSea, Rarible
WalletConnect integration (connect to any dApp)

8. Firmware Updates:

In-app firmware updates
Automatic notifications
Secure update process

Updates: Monthly (very active development)

Pros:

Beautiful UI/UX (best in industry)
All-in-one (buy, swap, stake, NFT)
Excellent mobile app
Staking 15+ coins
Frequent updates

Cons:

Closed-source (can't verify)
Fees on swaps (1% Ledger fee)
Privacy concerns (connects to Ledger servers)

Trezor Suite

Platform Availability:

Desktop: Windows, macOS, Linux (native apps)
Web: suite.trezor.io (browser-based)
Mobile: Limited (Android via USB-OTG)

Interface:

Design: Clean, minimalist, functional
Theme: Dark mode only
Navigation: Simple, organized
Learning curve: Low-medium

Core Features:

1. Portfolio Management:

Holdings overview (list view)
Real-time prices (CoinGecko)
Basic charts
Account organization
Fiat display (USD, EUR, etc.)

2. Buy Crypto:

Integrated partner: Invity (aggregator)
Payment methods: Bank transfer, card
Fewer options than Ledger
Fees: Partner fees (1-5%)

3. Sell Crypto:

Via Invity
Limited availability

4. Swap:

No native swap
Must use external services (Changelly, ChangeNOW via Invity)
Less convenient than Ledger

5. Staking:

No native staking
Must use: External services (Everstake, Exodus, etc.)
Process: Export wallet → Use third-party
Inconvenient

6. Bitcoin Power-User Features:

UTXO management (coin control)
Custom fees (set sat/vB manually)
RBF (Replace-By-Fee)
Labeling (organize transactions, UTXOs)
Advanced for Bitcoin power users

7. Privacy Features:

Tor integration (route traffic via Tor)
Coinjoin support (via external)
No Ledger server dependency
Self-hosted option

8. Firmware Updates:

In-app updates
Verify via GitHub (open-source)

Updates: Quarterly (less frequent than Ledger)

Pros:

Open-source (verifiable)
Privacy-focused (Tor)
Bitcoin power-user tools
Self-hosted option
No account required

Cons:

No native staking
No native swap (must use external)
Fewer features (vs Ledger Live)
Less polished UI
Weak mobile experience

Software Winner: Ledger Live

Ledger Live Wins:

More features (staking, better swap, NFTs)
Better UI/UX (more polished)
Excellent mobile app
All-in-one experience
Frequent updates

Trezor Suite Wins:

Open-source (verifiable)
Privacy (Tor, no accounts)
Bitcoin power-user tools
Self-hosted option

Verdict: For most users, Ledger Live is superior. For Bitcoin purists and privacy advocates, Trezor Suite's transparency and Tor support matter more.

Features Comparison

Side-by-side:

Feature	Ledger	Trezor
Buy Crypto	Yes (MoonPay, Coinify, Transak)	Yes (Invity)
Sell Crypto	Yes	Limited
Swap	Native (1inch, Paraswap)	External only
Staking	15+ coins (native)	None (external)
NFT Support	Gallery + Send	Limited
Mobile App	Excellent (Bluetooth)	Limited (USB-OTG)
dApp Browser	Discover (curated)	No
Portfolio Tracking	Advanced	Basic
Firmware Update	In-app	In-app
Tor Support	No	Yes
Coin Control	Limited	Advanced (BTC)
Labeling	Limited	Yes
Open-Source	Mostly closed	Fully open
Multi-Sig	Yes	Yes
Passphrase	Yes (25th word)	Yes (25th word)
Recovery Check	Yes	Yes

Feature Winner: Ledger (more features, especially for non-Bitcoin users)

Price & Value Comparison

Cost analysis:

Upfront Cost

Model	Ledger	Trezor
Entry	$79 (Nano S Plus)	$69 (Model One) / $79 (Safe 3)
Mid	$149 (Nano X)	-
Flagship	$149 (Nano X)	$219 (Model T)
Premium	$279 (Stax)	-

Cheapest Option: Trezor Model One ($69) Best Value: Ledger Nano S Plus ($79) or Nano X ($149)

Long-Term Costs

Ledger:

Device: $79-279 (one-time)
No subscription fees
Swap fees: 1% (optional, if use Ledger swap)
Buy/sell fees: Partner fees (1-5%, optional)
Staking: Free (just network fees)
Replacement: $79-149 every 5-10 years (battery degradation on Nano X)

Trezor:

Device: $69-219 (one-time)
No subscription fees
Swap fees: External service fees
Buy/sell fees: Partner fees (1-5%, optional)
Staking: External service fees (if applicable)
Replacement: $69-219 every 10+ years (no battery to fail)

Long-Term Winner: Tie (both minimal ongoing costs)

Value Proposition

Ledger Nano S Plus ($79):

5,500 coins, USB-C, 100 apps, secure element
Best value in hardware wallets

Ledger Nano X ($149):

Everything in S Plus + Bluetooth + battery
Worth $70 premium for mobile users

Trezor Model One ($69):

Cheapest hardware wallet
Open-source
But: Outdated (Micro-USB, small storage, no secure element)

Trezor Safe 3 ($79):

Same price as Nano S Plus
Color screen, USB-C, secure element, open-source
But: Only 1,000 coins (vs 5,500)

Trezor Model T ($219):

Touchscreen, open-source
But: $70 more than Nano X with fewer coins, no Bluetooth

Value Winner: Ledger (better features per dollar at every price point except open-source value)

Customer Support Comparison

When you need help:

Ledger Support

Channels:

Website: support.ledger.com (knowledge base)
Ticket system: Submit request online
Community: Reddit (r/ledgerwallet), Discord
Social media: Twitter (@Ledger_Support)
No phone support

Response Time:

Knowledge base: Instant (comprehensive)
Email tickets: 24-48 hours (varies)
Social media: 1-2 days

Quality:

Knowledge base: Excellent (detailed articles, videos)
Human support: Good (but sometimes slow)
Community: Active (helpful users)

Common Issues:

Firmware updates (well-documented)
App installation (guides available)
Recovery (step-by-step)

Pros:

Comprehensive documentation
Video tutorials
Active community

Cons:

No phone support
Tickets can be slow
2020 data breach = phishing emails (caution)

Trezor Support

Channels:

Website: trezor.io/support (knowledge base)
Ticket system: Submit request via email
Community: Reddit (r/TREZOR), Discord
Social media: Twitter (@Trezor)
No phone support

Response Time:

Knowledge base: Instant (good coverage)
Email tickets: 24-72 hours
Community: Active

Quality:

Knowledge base: Good (technical)
Human support: Good (smaller team)
Community: Very helpful (Bitcoin community strong)

Pros:

Transparent (open-source = community can help)
Bitcoin community expertise
Helpful documentation

Cons:

Smaller team (slower responses)
No phone support

Support Winner: Tie (both rely on documentation + tickets, no phone support)

Pros and Cons Summary

Complete comparison:

Ledger

Pros:

Broader Coin Support - 5,500+ assets (5.5x more than Trezor)
- Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand, etc.
Better Value - More features per dollar
- Nano S Plus: $79 (5,500 coins vs Trezor's 1,000)
- Nano X: $149 (vs Trezor T at $219)
Bluetooth & Mobile - True mobile experience
- Nano X: Wireless, battery, iOS/Android app
Superior Software - Ledger Live is best-in-class
- Staking 15+ coins
- Native swap
- NFT gallery
- Beautiful UI
Secure Element - Bank-grade hardware security
- CC EAL5+ certified
- More resistant to physical attacks
Staking Support - Earn rewards natively
- Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, etc.
- 3-20% APY
Beginner-Friendly - Easier to use
- Intuitive interface
- Great documentation
- Lower learning curve

Cons:

Closed-Source - Can't fully verify firmware
- Must trust Ledger + auditors
- "Black box" criticism
2020 Data Breach - Customer info leaked
- 270,000 names, addresses, emails
- No funds lost, but privacy concern
- Phishing risk increased
Bluetooth = Wireless - Potential attack surface
- Theoretically less secure (minimal risk realistically)
- Purists prefer USB-only
Battery Life - Nano X battery degrades (3-5 years)
- Eventually loses Bluetooth (still works via USB)
Centralization Concerns - Private company
- Venture-backed (vs Trezor bootstrap)
- Profit-driven decisions

Trezor

Pros:

Fully Open-Source - Maximum transparency
- Hardware + firmware verifiable
- Community audited
- No hidden backdoors
Pioneering Brand - First hardware wallet (2013)
- Invented category
- Strong Bitcoin heritage
- Trusted by OGs
Touchscreen - Model T has intuitive touchscreen
- Easier PIN entry (vs buttons)
- Better UX for confirmations
No Wireless - USB-only (security purists prefer)
- No Bluetooth attack surface
- No battery to fail
Privacy-Focused - Czech company, EU laws
- Tor support in Trezor Suite
- No account required
- Privacy culture
Bitcoin Tools - Advanced Bitcoin features
- Coin control (UTXO management)
- Labeling
- Custom fees
- Best for Bitcoin power users
Bootstrap-Funded - Independent company
- Not venture-backed
- Community-focused

Cons:

Limited Coin Support - Only 1,000+ coins
- Missing: Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand
- Not viable for multi-chain portfolios
No Native Staking - Must use external services
- Inconvenient
- Extra steps
Weaker Software - Trezor Suite less feature-rich
- No native swap
- Limited NFT support
- Basic portfolio tracking
Physical Vulnerability - No secure element (Model One, T)
- Vulnerable to physical attacks (with lab equipment)
- Requires passphrase for max security
Expensive Flagship - Model T costs $219
- $70 more than Ledger Nano X
- Fewer features (no Bluetooth, fewer coins)
No Mobile App - Weak mobile experience
- Android via USB-OTG (cumbersome)
- No iOS support
Outdated Entry Model - Model One has Micro-USB
- 2013 design
- Small screen, limited storage

Which to Choose: Decision Framework

Helping you decide:

Choose Ledger If:

You hold multiple cryptocurrencies

Especially: Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand, Avalanche
Multi-chain portfolio (10+ different coins)
Want one device for everything

You use mobile primarily

iOS or Android user
Want Bluetooth convenience
Travel frequently

You want to stake crypto

Earn passive income (3-20% APY)
Stake Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, etc.
Native staking in Ledger Live

You're a beginner

First hardware wallet
Want easiest experience
Prefer beautiful, intuitive software

You value certified security

Trust bank-grade secure element
Want CC EAL5+ certification
Prefer hardware-level security

You want best value

$79 for Nano S Plus (incredible value)
$149 for Nano X (vs $219 Trezor T)

You use NFTs

View/send NFTs in wallet
OpenSea integration
NFT gallery

Choose Trezor If:

You're an open-source purist

Transparency > everything
Must verify code yourself
Don't trust closed-source
Philosophical commitment

You're Bitcoin-only or Bitcoin-first

Don't hold Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, etc.
Want best Bitcoin tools (coin control, labeling)
Bitcoin maximalist

You want touchscreen

Prefer touchscreen over buttons
Easier PIN entry
Modern input method

You prioritize privacy

Want Tor support
EU-based company (Czech privacy laws)
No Bluetooth (no wireless)

You distrust Bluetooth

Security purist (USB-only)
No wireless attack surface
Wired-only philosophy

You need cheapest option

Trezor Model One ($69)
If budget is absolute constraint

You're a Bitcoin power user

Advanced UTXO management
Custom fees, RBF, coin control
Labeling and organization

Still Can't Decide? Answer These:

Question 1: "Do you hold Solana, Polkadot, or Cosmos?"

YES → Ledger (Trezor doesn't support them)
NO → Continue

Question 2: "Do you want to stake your crypto natively?"

YES → Ledger (15+ coins, easy)
NO → Continue

Question 3: "Is open-source mandatory for you?"

YES → Trezor (fully open-source)
NO → Continue

Question 4: "Do you primarily use mobile?"

YES → Ledger Nano X (Bluetooth)
NO → Continue

Question 5: "Do you only hold Bitcoin + Ethereum?"

YES → Either works (slight edge Trezor for open-source)
NO → Ledger (broader support)

Question 6: "What's your budget?"

Under $75 → Trezor Model One ($69)
$75-150 → Ledger Nano S Plus ($79) or Nano X ($149)
$150+ → Trezor Model T ($219) if open-source matters

Question 7: "Are you a beginner?"

YES → Ledger (easier software, better support)
NO → Either

Question 8: "Do you need touchscreen?"

YES → Trezor Model T
NO → Either

Quick Recommendation Chart

Your Profile	Recommendation	Model	Price
Multi-chain holder	Ledger	Nano X	$149
Mobile user	Ledger	Nano X	$149
Staking enthusiast	Ledger	Nano X	$149
Beginner	Ledger	Nano S Plus	$79
Budget-conscious	Ledger	Nano S Plus	$79
Open-source purist	Trezor	Model T	$219
Bitcoin maximalist	Trezor	Model T	$219
Touchscreen lover	Trezor	Model T	$219
Privacy advocate	Trezor	Model T	$219
Absolute cheapest	Trezor	Model One	$69

Real User Scenarios

Practical examples:

Scenario 1: Sarah - Crypto Beginner

Profile:

First hardware wallet
Holds: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana
Uses: iPhone primarily
Wants: Easy, simple

Best Choice: Ledger Nano X ($149)

Why:

Supports all 3 coins (Trezor missing Solana)
Bluetooth = mobile convenience
Ledger Live = easiest software
Beginner-friendly setup

Alternative: Ledger Nano S Plus ($79) if desktop-only

Scenario 2: Mike - Bitcoin Maximalist

Profile:

Bitcoin-only holder (10 BTC)
Values: Open-source, transparency
Uses: Desktop (Linux)
Wants: Maximum security, advanced tools

Best Choice: Trezor Model T ($219)

Why:

Fully open-source (philosophy alignment)
Best Bitcoin tools (coin control, labeling)
Touchscreen (better UX)
No need for multi-chain support

Alternative: Coldcard Mk4 ($158) for absolute max security

Scenario 3: Alex - Multi-Chain DeFi User

Profile:

Holds: 15+ different cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, SOL, DOT, ATOM, AVAX, etc.)
Uses: DeFi, staking, NFTs
Platform: Desktop + mobile
Wants: All-in-one solution

Best Choice: Ledger Nano X ($149)

Why:

5,500 coins (supports entire portfolio)
Native staking (15+ coins, passive income)
NFT support
Bluetooth (mobile DeFi)
Ledger Live (all features)

No Alternative: Trezor can't support this portfolio (missing SOL, DOT, ATOM, AVAX)

Scenario 4: Emma - Privacy Advocate

Profile:

Values: Privacy, anonymity
Holds: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Monero
Uses: Desktop (Tor)
Wants: Maximum privacy

Best Choice: Trezor Model T ($219)

Why:

Open-source (no trust required)
Tor support (Trezor Suite)
No Bluetooth (no wireless tracking)
Czech company (EU privacy laws)

Alternative: Coldcard Mk4 ($158) for Bitcoin-only max privacy

Scenario 5: David - Budget Student

Profile:

Student, tight budget
Holds: $500 in Bitcoin + Ethereum
First hardware wallet
Wants: Cheapest secure option

Best Choice: Ledger Nano S Plus ($79)

Why:

Only $10 more than Trezor Model One
But: USB-C (vs Micro-USB), 5,500 coins (vs 1,000), secure element
Better value
Still affordable

Alternative: Trezor Model One ($69) if $10 matters

Scenario 6: Lisa - Ethereum NFT Collector

Profile:

100+ NFTs (Ethereum, Polygon)
Uses: OpenSea, mobile
Wants: View NFTs, easy mobile use

Best Choice: Ledger Nano X ($149)

Why:

NFT gallery in Ledger Live
View/send NFTs easily
Bluetooth (mobile OpenSea use)
Polygon support

No Alternative: Trezor has limited NFT support

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ledger safer than Trezor?

Different approaches, both very safe. Ledger: Secure element (CC EAL5+ certified, bank-grade chip), more resistant to physical attacks, but closed-source (must trust). Trezor: Fully open-source (verifiable code, no backdoors), but vulnerable to physical attacks with lab equipment (use passphrase for protection). Track record: Both 0 remote hacks in 10+ years. Verdict: Ledger slightly safer against physical attacks; Trezor more transparent/auditable. For 99% of users, both are equally secure - bigger risks are user error and not using hardware wallet at all.

Which has more coins: Ledger or Trezor?

Ledger wins massively. Ledger supports 5,500+ cryptocurrencies and tokens; Trezor supports 1,000+. Critical difference: Ledger supports Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, Algorand, Avalanche, and many modern chains. Trezor is missing these major L1s. Verdict: Multi-chain holders MUST use Ledger. Trezor only viable if you hold only Bitcoin + Ethereum + a few other older coins.

Should I buy Ledger Nano X or Trezor Model T?

Ledger Nano X for most people. Nano X advantages: $70 cheaper ($149 vs $219), Bluetooth (mobile use), 5,500 coins (vs 1,000), native staking (15+ coins), better software. Model T advantages: Open-source (verifiable), touchscreen (easier input), no Bluetooth (purists prefer). Choose Nano X if: Multi-chain, mobile user, staking, value. Choose Model T if: Open-source mandatory, Bitcoin-focused, touchscreen preference, willing to pay $70 premium for transparency.

Is Trezor open-source?

Yes, fully. Trezor is completely open-source - hardware schematics, firmware code, bootloader all on GitHub. Anyone can verify, audit, or build from source. This is Trezor's main differentiator. Ledger: Mostly closed-source (secure element firmware proprietary), some components open. Trade-off: Trezor = trust code (verifiable), Ledger = trust certification (audited by governments). Philosophy: Open-source purists prefer Trezor; those who trust bank certifications prefer Ledger.

Can Trezor be hacked?

No remote hacks ever (11 years). Keys never leave device, transaction signed offline - even fully infected computer can't steal keys. Physical attack: Possible on Model One and Model T (extract seed with voltage glitching, requires physical device + $1,000 equipment + expertise). Mitigation: Use passphrase (25th word) - makes physical attack useless. Reality: Physical attacks require sophisticated lab setup, not threat for 99% of users. Bigger risks: phishing, fake addresses, losing seed phrase.

Does Ledger support Solana?

Yes. Ledger Nano X and Nano S Plus both support Solana (SOL) and all SPL tokens. Install Solana app via Ledger Live, manage with Phantom or Solflare wallet. Trezor does NOT support Solana (major limitation). If you hold SOL, Ledger is mandatory.

Which is better for Bitcoin: Ledger or Trezor?

Trezor Model T for Bitcoin purists. Why: Fully open-source (Bitcoin ethos), first hardware wallet (2013, Bitcoin heritage), advanced tools (coin control, UTXO management, labeling, custom fees), no Bluetooth (security purists prefer). But: Ledger also excellent for Bitcoin - secure element (higher physical security), both support all Bitcoin features (SegWit, Taproot, multisig, Lightning). Verdict: Trezor if philosophy matters (open-source, privacy), Ledger if you also hold altcoins.

Is Ledger Live better than Trezor Suite?

Yes, for most users. Ledger Live has more features: native staking (15+ coins), better swap integration, NFT gallery, mobile app, beautiful UI. Trezor Suite advantages: open-source (verifiable), Tor support (privacy), Bitcoin power-user tools. Verdict: Ledger Live wins for features/UX; Trezor Suite wins for transparency/privacy. If you stake crypto or use NFTs, Ledger Live essential.

Can I use both Ledger and Trezor?

Yes! Hardware wallets use industry-standard BIP39 seed phrases - you can have multiple wallets, split funds across them (diversification). Setup: Buy Ledger + Trezor, create separate seed phrases, split portfolio. Benefit: If one company fails or device breaks, other wallet still works. Cost: $79-219 per device. Recommendation: Only worth it for $50K+ holdings - otherwise, just use passphrase (25th word) on one device for multiple wallets.

Which is better value: Ledger or Trezor?

Ledger. At every price point, Ledger offers more per dollar: Entry: Nano S Plus ($79) has USB-C, 5,500 coins, secure element vs Trezor One ($69) with Micro-USB, 1,000 coins, no secure element - worth $10 extra. Flagship: Nano X ($149) has Bluetooth, battery, 5,500 coins, staking vs Model T ($219) with touchscreen, 1,000 coins, no staking - Nano X is $70 cheaper with more features. Exception: Trezor offers open-source (priceless for some). But purely features-per-dollar: Ledger wins.

Conclusion: The Verdict

You now have complete knowledge to choose between Ledger and Trezor! Let's summarize:

Final Scores:

Ledger Wins: 9 Categories

Coin Support (5,500+ vs 1,000+)
Price/Value ($79-149 vs $69-219)
Software (Ledger Live superior)
Staking (15+ coins vs none)
Mobile Experience (Bluetooth vs none)
NFT Support (gallery vs limited)
Physical Security (secure element vs none on Model One/T)
Features (swap, buy, sell integrated)
Beginner-Friendly (easier setup/UX)

Trezor Wins: 5 Categories

Open-Source (fully vs mostly closed)
Touchscreen (Model T vs buttons)
Privacy (Tor, no Bluetooth)
Bitcoin Tools (UTXO control, labeling)
Cheapest Option (Model One $69)

Overall Winner: Ledger (for 80% of users)

Ledger is better for:

Multi-chain holders (Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos users)
Mobile users (Bluetooth essential)
Stakers (passive income seekers)
Beginners (easiest experience)
Value seekers (more features per dollar)
NFT collectors (gallery + OpenSea)

Trezor is better for:

Open-source purists (transparency mandatory)
Bitcoin maximalists (best BTC tools)
Privacy advocates (Tor, no wireless)
Touchscreen preference (Model T)
Those who distrust closed-source

Specific Recommendations:

Best Overall Hardware Wallet: Ledger Nano X ($149)

Broadest support, best features, mobile-ready

Best Value Hardware Wallet: Ledger Nano S Plus ($79)

95% of Nano X for 53% of price

Best Open-Source Hardware Wallet: Trezor Model T ($219)

Fully transparent, touchscreen, premium

Best Budget Hardware Wallet: Trezor Model One ($69)

Cheapest entry point (but recommend spending $10 more for Nano S Plus)

Best for Bitcoin-Only: Trezor Model T ($219)

Open-source + Bitcoin tools

Best for Multi-Chain: Ledger Nano X ($149)

Only option for Solana/Polkadot/Cosmos holders

Can't Go Wrong:

Truth: Both Ledger and Trezor are industry-leading, battle-tested hardware wallets. You're securing your crypto well with either choice. The differences matter for specific use cases, but both are light-years ahead of software wallets or exchanges.

Biggest risks are NOT the wallet brand, but:

User error (phishing, fake sites)
Losing seed phrase
Not using hardware wallet at all

Choose based on YOUR priorities:

Multi-chain + features → Ledger
Open-source + transparency → Trezor

Either way: You're making smart security decision by using hardware wallet.

Join our CryptoSupreme community to discuss Ledger vs Trezor experiences, share setup tips, compare security setups, get buying advice, and stay updated on the latest hardware wallet releases and security best practices!

Ledger vs Trezor 2025: Which Hardware Wallet is Better?

Ommyflashing