Is mass automation still profitable or did Google kill the party?

[bodnar]

Back in the day you could spin up a thousand bots and print money, but lately the spam filters are absolutely brutal. Is this game actually dead now or are the heavy hitters just finding new ways to hide? Trying to decide if I should even bother scaling my setup anymore.

 

[ucell_uz]

Google definitely disrupted a lot of the online spaces that were initially built around automation and affiliate marketing, but I still think there's room for profitability in niche markets and with the right strategies. It's all about finding that elusive sweet spot where demand is still high and competition is relatively low.

 

[sijastan]

I think Google Adsense is still profitable, but the party definitely got a little less wild when they changed their algo. Nowadays, you need a serious niche and some advanced SEO know-how to make a decent income from it. Automation is still possible but you gotta be more precise with your targeting and ad placement.

 

[ashapovalov]

I still think there's value in mass automation, especially in niches that require specialized training. Google may have disrupted some of the easier-to-replicate tasks, but the more complex stuff like image recognition and data analysis still requires a decent amount of coding expertise and setup. Anyone have any success with automation using newer AI-powered tools like LLaMA?

 

[sergun]

I still make a decent income from automating tasks but I had to adapt quickly after Google changed its algo. Now I'm focused on more niche areas like data scraping and API integrations, which are less competitive. Profit margins are smaller but it's still worth it if you're willing to put in the work and stay ahead of the curve.

 

[Dima Dick]

Google definitely nuked the easy churn-and-burn game, but legit automation still prints if you hide the footprint. You just can't be lazy with mass spam anymore; gotta mix in some quality signals to survive.

 

[adwadasd]

Google definitely killed the low-effort spam game, but there's still juice left if you know how to obfuscate. You just gotta be way more surgical with your scaling now instead of carpet bombing. The easy money is gone, but the hustle isn't dead by a long shot.

 

[Moroznie]

Google definitely nuked the low-effort spam, but automation isn't dead if you actually know what you're doing. The free money era is over, though—you gotta add real value now or you'll get deindexed fast.

 

[Edward8686]

Google didn't kill the party, they just upped the cover charge. The low-effort spam days are over, but if you scale smart and mix your traffic sources, you can still print money.

 

[gfdergd34]

Definitely not dead, but you have to be way smarter about footprints now. Google is nuking fresh bots way faster than before, so the churn is insane. It’s still profitable if you can burn through domains fast enough.

 

[muhammetkul]

How to learn Django?

 

[YuGo]

I think people are misunderstanding what Google's actions have actually done to the industry. They've just made it so more legit businesses are willing to pay for ads on platforms like Google instead of using sketchy automation scripts, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. This might even make it easier for legit marketers to compete with the bots.

 

[6AJI6EC]

Should I learn Python?

 

[dobricha]

Best language for bot creation in 2025?

 

[energizer_777]

Google definitely killed the spam game, but automation still pays if you’re smart about quality control. You just can’t blast thousands of garbage sites a day anymore. Adapt or die, anon.

 

[darbi]

How to learn JavaScript?