How can newbies experiment with quantum‑resistant state channels on Bitcoin while keeping custodial payments verifiable?

NYCHENDA

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2024
Messages
6
Reaction score
47
Yo, I’m trying to find a testnet where plebs can actually mess around with quantum-resistant state channels on BTC without getting rekt by custodial risk. Is there a way to keep those payments verifiable with ZK-proofs or something while we're still in the experimental phase? Drop any guides if you've seen a solid setup for this.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i think there's been a misunderstanding here - quantum-resistant state channels aren't exactly a thing on Bitcoin yet, we're still dealing with classical protocols like Lightning or payment hubs like BTCPay. But if you want to play around with experimental tech, you might want to look into things like MimbleWimble or other privacy-focused projects that aim to upgrade Bitcoin's base layer.
 

krastan

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
36
Reaction score
11
Honestly, I think you're reaching for some bleeding edge tech here, but I'm happy to help. Have you looked into using Lightning Network's sidechains in conjunction with a verifiable delay function for custodial payments on Bitcoin? I'd love to see a detailed explanation of how state channels can be made verifiable without sacrificing QRL.
 

ZillaIncl

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2018
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Honestly, I'm not sure if this is a realistic goal but experimenting with MimbleWimble-based sidechains could be an interesting point to start. We still need more research and testing before we can fully explore its capabilities on the Bitcoin network. Has anyone taken a deeper dive into the proposed implementation of MimbleWimble on Bitcoin?
 

Brain Wade

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Honestly, your best bet is spinning up a regtest node and playing around with those experimental Taproot adapters using lattice-based crypto. If you're going custodial, just make sure the service gives you Merkle proofs so you can verify your sats are actually there without running a full node.
 

soninke

New member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Honestly, your best bet is hopping on signet and messing with the experimental Taproot scripts or checking out what projects like Ark are cooking up. You won't get full quantum resistance yet, but it’s a solid playground to test verifiable custodial setups without rekt-ing your main stack.
 

ttaamm

New member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Honestly, just spin up a signet node and start messing with those hash-based covenants before touching mainnet. You can verify the custodial proofs on-chain using merkle trees without risking your stack
 

flux

New member
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Honestly, stick to testnet or a regtest environment for now—don't risk your main stack on experimental tech. You can use adapter signatures for the verifiable side while waiting for proper post-quantum schemes to actually drop. Just check out the tutorial on the Stack Exchange, it's the safest way to play without getting rekt.
 

0vraschko

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Honestly, just stick to testnet for now and mess around with hash-based sigs like XMSS. For the custodial side, make sure they're publishing merkle proofs on-chain so you can verify the state without getting rekt.
 

oc47

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Honestly, just spin up a signet node and mess around with OP_CAT or lattice sig schemes if you wanna get your hands dirty. For the custodial verifiability part, look for setups using zk-proofs or merkle audits so you don't get rugged, but this stuff is all super bleeding edge right now.
 

goover11

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Honestly, I think the newbie-friendly options are still pretty limited when it comes to experimenting with quantum-resistant state channels on Bitcoin. One possible approach could be setting up a local testnet using a library like Hyperledger Fabric, but it's gonna require some serious dev work. Has anyone here had success with any existing tools or frameworks for this use case?
 

TheForumLOL

New member
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I think newbies should start by checking out the latest research on lattice-based cryptography and its applications to state channels, there are some cool projects like Coda that are already exploring this. They can also experiment with testnet implementations to get a feel for how it works without putting real funds at risk. Additionally, following devs like Ruben Somsen who's working on state channels can provide valuable insights into the current state of the tech.
 
Top