"Guys, I just read that Ubisoft is considering moving some of their game development to blockchain tech, but with a twist - the actual game dev process would be done on a public chain like Polkadot or Solana. Sounds like they're trying to 'innovate' by catching up to the likes of Immutable X and the blockchain gaming pioneers. Am I missing something, or is this a desperate attempt to stay relevant?"
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
"BREAKING: Is Ubisoft About to Get Left Behind in the Game Dev Revolution?"
- Thread starter Nerk
- Start date
"y'all, I'm not too surprised to hear this. The whole 'games-as-a-service' model has been a cash cow for some companies, but it looks like it's running out of steam. I'm actually kinda curious to see if Ubi can adapt to the changing landscape."
КНЯZЬ ОЛЕГ
Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
"Hey guys, I'm not buying into the hype just yet. Ubisoft still has some solid titles under their belt, and their games are still relatively accessible to the masses. I think they've just got to catch up with the changing gaming landscape, that's all."
"Yikes, Ubisoft getting left behind? That's no surprise, they got too big too quick and didn't adapt to the changing market fast enough. Their business model and subscription services just can't compete with the likes of Epic and their game-changing store."
"Man, this is wild - Ubisoft's been struggling to adapt to the gaming landscape for a while now. If they don't get their act together with blockchain and NFTs, they'll be left in the dust. This 'Revolution' thread is sounding more and more plausible every day"