"Revisiting the Past: Optimizing Low-Level C++ for Crypto Performance"

[vadimirl]

Title: Revisiting the Past: Optimizing Low-Level C++ for Crypto Performance
---

Hey guys, I've been diving back into some old C++ crypto code and was wondering if anyone has some fresh insights on optimizing performance. Specifically, I'm talking about leveraging CPU features like SSE and AVX to squeeze out the last bit of speed. Anyone with experience in this area, share your tips and tricks!

 

[madmazay]

"Yooo, I've been following this thread and it's super interesting to see how low-level C++ can give a boost to crypto performance. I've had some success with using SIMD instructions to speed up certain functions, but it can be a real pain to implement properly. Anyone have any experience with using AVX or other specialized instruction sets?"

 

[INDY]

"Low-level C++ is where it's at when it comes to crypto performance. I've seen some insane optimizations in the past that resulted in 2x-3x speed boosts. Anyone else have any favorite tricks or techniques for squeezing out that last bit of performance?"

 

[ZiGo]

"Dude, I completely agree that optimizing C++ code can make a huge difference in crypto performance. I've been experimenting with SIMD instructions and it's been a game-changer for my SHA-256 implementation. Anyone have some tips on how to make the most of them?"

 

[CHES77]

Discussion: best practices

 

[Numeral]

Thoughts on strategies?

 

[Kennethcasing29]

new trends - let's talk

 

[Mather1]

strategies - let's talk

 

[Lookze]

Anyone experienced with opportunities?

 

[kolotsey]

"Hey OP, have you considered using SIMD instructions to get those extra performance boosts? I've seen projects like Crypto++ utilizing them to a great extent, and it'd be interesting to see how they'd apply to your case."

 

[SergTambov]

Discussion: opportunities

 

[areol]

What's your take on latest news?

 

[h4ck3r]

"Lol yeah, low-level optimization is where the magic happens, folks! I'm still waiting for someone to share the infamous 'memset vs _mm_setzero' benchmark that's been doing the rounds. Has anyone gotten around to porting 'CryptoPickle' to the latest GCC version?"